Feminism is Actually Worse for Women
If women really think they want feminism (with its pros/cons), they might want to think twice cuz it’s actually worse for them — hear me out!!
In the shortest summary possible, feminism is trying to convince women to trade off guys covering ALL their expenses, so that women can get a ~10% pay increase…? Bad deal π ββοΈ
Scenario 1 (“Originally/Traditionally/Chivalry”): a guy makes $100k and pays for everything, while his GF is [allegedly] doing the exact same job for $90k .. After paying tax, she has like $60k discretionary spend, while the guy has little to no discretionary spend after paying the cost of housing/food/etc
Scenario 2 (“Feminism”): the guy and girl both make $100k, they both split everything .. After tax, they both have $60k .. after splitting housing/food/etc they both have $30k discretionary spend
With feminism, yes the female’s gross income is up $10k π§ .. BUT she’s actually lost $30k (50%) of her discretionary spend because of feminism π
With feminism, the guy still makes $100k, but now has $30k discretionary spend π Thanks to our female partners covering half of our expenses, men are now better off thanks to feminism πΊ
So if you ask me about ‘feminism’ — YES! I’m totally down for my female partner getting a ~10% wage incrase and then splitting all the expenses 50/50 π€£π
PS: I believe in equality of men/women, I’m just saying feminists demanding equal pay (even tho pay is = performance/dollar) might want to play it forward and consider the full ramifications before they speak π
PPS: I DO NOT believe unequal pay is actually occurring .. I believe men/women get paid proportional to their output .. If women generated the exact same quality/output — every company would fire all the men and only hire women to save money (if this were true)..
PPPS: I think feminism (scenario 2) is great π€π Especially if they open doors for me 50% of the time π€£π